Local ML researchPython / executable evidence

The answer starts with a test.

Predicate comparison10 × 10 inputs
Isometric comparison of strict and non-strict order for input pairs from 0 to 9. The copper diagonal marks the equal pairs that change the result.
Copper: the outputs disagree.

Local, trainable Python bug discovery.
No trained checkpoint or measured advantage yet.

Explore the method

Current milestone
First reproducible training run.

The method

A counterexample
you can inspect.

A specific input can expose what a confident explanation misses.

A worked example · booking windowsMerge overlapping or touching windows without losing occupied time.

The implementation · Python

def merge_windows(windows):
    merged = []
    for start, end in sorted(windows):
        if not merged:
            merged.append([start, end])
        elif start <= merged[-1][1]:
            merged[-1][1] = end
        else:
            merged.append([start, end])
    return merged
Preserve the furthest endend max(merged[-1][1], end)

Input · minutes[(0, 10), (2, 4), (8, 12)]

Original · windows20–4 · 8–12
Corrected · windows10–12

The nested window shrinks the stored end from 10 to 4. Minutes 4–8 disappear from the result.

assert merge_windows(windows) == [[0, 12]]

Curated example with valid, nonempty windows.
JavaScript evaluates the shown logic. No model or Python runner.

Expected behaviour → counterexample → review

A failing test alone does not prove a defect.

From a suspicion
to something
you can inspect.

Our proposed model works on an approved repository snapshot. An independent runner checks its witness.

  1. 01

    Read the code

    The snapshot and its context are visible. Issue reports, reference patches and answer tests stay sealed.

  2. 02

    Make a testable claim

    Locate a likely fault. State the expected behaviour. Propose a minimal pytest counterexample.

  3. 03

    Let the evidence answer

    Run against buggy and fixed revisions in isolation. An independent reviewer decides whether the behaviour is a defect.

Research, in progress

Research before
release.

We want to know whether training a compact model improves useful bug discovery.

That calls for a blind comparison with the frozen base model, under the same conditions.

Read the research profile
Trained checkpoint
Not yet
Measured advantage
Not established
Next milestone
Reproducible first training run

DataProvenance and explicit source licences.

EvaluationHeld-out repositories. Independently reviewed root causes.

CostFalse alerts, latency, memory and review effort.

Inside NeuroTestix

Six core product repositories, currently private.
Links require collaborator access. Public releases will follow review.

Follow the research.

Follow on GitHub
ntx42.com